« Shutting down bald... | Newest entries | QOOP -- the final chapter? » I got a response from QOOP about the perceived problems with my order. Be sure to see the newer entry about this issue. Here's what I had written: I just recived the photo book I ordered last week, and I am a bit disappointed in the image quality. A lot of the details that appear in the original images I uploaded to flickr are simply not visible, and overall the images appear pixellated. One example of this is a "macro" phtograph of a grasshopper, which was a 1200x2400 pixel image when I uploaded it. And here is the reply I got from QOOP: From: "Bill Murray" <xxxx@qoop.com> I haven't yet decided what I'll do next. To me, the visual evidence of comparing the uploaded image to the flickr "1024 px" image to the printed image made a pretty solid case, but QOOP says I'm barking up the wrong tree there. Here is a comparison of the original image, the flickr
"1024 px" image, and a photograph of the image printed by QOOP. It is a very
small area of the grasshopper
photo, from the base of the wings. In the flickr "1024 px" image, the bright vertical traits are about 1px wide, while
in the original image they're several pixels wide. In the qoop photo, I see a
stairstep effect that matches the "1024 px" image, but which is not in the
original.
|
| [æ] |